Granted, I'm not a devout Starbucks drinker even though I like their caramel macchiatos, but this completely reeks of an ad campaign that insults the customer's intelligence. It's the flip-side of my concerns around the Microsoft "our product might stink, but how about that bang for the buck?" ad campaign I had referenced in an earlier post.
So the point, Mr. Schultz, is that I should be willing to pay 75 to 150% more on a comparable cup of coffee because it's much better to order my coffee from someone with a green apron who hands it off to someone who will stick it on a round side table while calling out my order as opposed to getting it from a red-uniformed McDonald's cashier? Or maybe I'm paying for the leather seat and rug within the Starbucks that I never get to use because it's jammed packed, or the absence of kids which would plague a McDonald's.
I'm not quite understanding the value proposition.
No comments:
Post a Comment