Freedom of Speech! ... or No Intolerance!

I have trouble understanding why people seem to speak out on both sides of their mouths when it comes to freedom of speech and the censorship of things deemed offensive. Basically, if you believe in something that offends others, scream "Freedom of Speech!". If you're offended by something, scream "Intolerance!" or "Hate!"

At Temple University in Philadelphia a few weeks ago, the campus was awash in controversy around guest speaker Dutch politician Geert Wilders, known for his anti-Islamic and anti-immigration beliefs. Wilders allegedly inciting hatred of Muslims after releasing his short film "Fitna," in which Quran verses are shown alongside images from terrorist attacks. More shocking, Wilders had called for bans on the Quran - likening it to Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf - and the burka, the Muslim women's garment that covers most of the body.

People around the campus were rightly offended. What I found to be alarming is the number of people, ironically from affinity groups, who wanted Wilders to be banned outright. Isn't diversity and inclusion about allowing freedom of speech even for those with whom you disagree? The much better tact - and one which would be consistent with true freedom of expression and diversity and inclusion ideals - would to have demonstrations and speakers (which did happen) of people who gave an opposing viewpoint. Silencing people isn't the answer. Engaging with them in constructive debate or voicing contrary views serves the purpose of respecting their rights while not counteracting what you feel is wrongheaded thinking.

So for me, I absolutely detest the messages that will be featured on atheist ads to be filling New York City subway stations. But if we're in a true liberal democracy, it would be improper to stifle such freedom of expression by banning their right to purchase public advertising space - after all, they're not walking into a church with a megaphone. All I ask in return is that pro-faith advertising and forms of expressions should be allowed, and they are - ranging from the occasional sign I see publicizing a church, the the man handing out tracts in the station.

People need to be consistent about their convictions of freedom of speech and diversity and inclusion. For those of us who value those three ideals, the absolute worst thing you have have is "selective freedom of speech" and the "inclusion" for only the people that don't offend you. That really isn't freedom of speech and diversity and inclusion at all. In fact, I can think of few things as intolerant.