Flash forward to earlier this month, when President Obama found it fit to reverse President Bush's executive order and release the floodgates of funding for embryonic stem cell research. What President Obama failed to do is acknowledge, as the writer states, that ethics must be clear in firm because science is flexible, as demonstrated by these new advances.
This is why I find it ridiculous when President Obama tries to self-righteously insist that scientific decisions must be "based on facts, not ideology" and that "dogma will no longer guide American policy." That's so incredibly disingenuous on so many levels. The reality is that facts themselves morally neutral, that's why you absolutely need ethics to guide scientific research. Nazi scientist Josef Mengele conducted ghastly experiments on Jews to determine, for example, the ability to survive certain amputations and chemical injections. At the end of the day the results of those experiments became fact. But those facts bear no moral compass on whether the experiments themselves were ethical or not.
And as for ideology and dogma? Let's be frank - the "new" policy around stem-cell research is absolutely driven by ideology and dogma. It's the ideology and dogma that a human embryo is not a life, and that the proliferation of death of human embryos is absolutely worth the chance that we'll find a cure for degenerative diseases. It's an ideology and dogma fully subscribed to by President Obama and his supporters.
No comments:
Post a Comment